Pilgrim In An Unholy Land: 2008-10-12

Roger Williams and Legacy! We are all Pilgrims in an unholy land.

Paul Told the Thessalonians This Regarding the Second Coming.

Roger Williams

"In the poor small span of my life, I desired to have been a diligent and constant observer. . . and yet cannot in the holy presence of God bring in the result of a satisfying discovery, that either the begetting ministry of the apostles or messengers to the nations, or the feeding and nourishing ministry of pastors and teachers, according to the first institution of the Lord Jesus, are yet restored and extant", he said. In the 1600s he founded Rhode Island and a group called the Seekers, who would await the day when Christ saw fit to restore His Church. For having such "strange" beliefs he was banished and driven out of Mass., being persecuted for the gospel's sake 200 years before its restoration, demonstrating an historically reoccuring pattern. Nevertheless, he waited and watched!

Roger Williams and the Gospel.

Roger Williams founded the first state with a "hedge" as he liked to call it, separating the state from religion. He did this, because he wanted to find truth and this could only happen when religion was free of government corruption. If there was still a pure religion, it had to be unspotted by government corruption.
In Rhode Island, there was no state sponsored religion, no taxes to support a state run religion, but that never meant a public figure couldn't speak about God, that certainly never meant that they shouldn't pray and ask for guidance in their personal life. Roger Williams was perhaps the brightest, most liberal (when liberalism was about considering all religious ideas, not considering nothing) . He was a man that most Christians as well Jews would hold in the highest esteem. It was because of His leadership, that the first Jewish community was founded in North America and he was co-founder of the first Baptist church in North America. How did he come to conclusions about true religion and priesthood authority, which are totally consistent with 'Mormonism'? I would submit that it was from a lifetime of Bible study and understanding its precepts. If you study Williams life, you will appreciate how much he loved the Bible and tried to live it, how much he desired to interpret it and live it correctly. He is a man who loved native Americans, who gave them free goods, who unlike the puritans, obtained their land legally, who did work for widows when he had nothing to do but wait for an audience with the King of England. He is universally loved by historians. He was a man so loved by the Narragansett Indians that their sachem asked to be buried in Williams clothing. Here are some excerpts from Timothy L. Halls, "Separation of Church and State", University of Illinois Press, 1998. These are from pages 25-27. These quotes clearly show that the LDS idea of a need for apostolic succession and a line of authority aren't 19th century invention, but through careful study of the Bible, one can and should draw the conclusion that there was an apostasy in Christ's Church and that authority was lost and there was a need for a restitution."when [Roger Williams] arrived in Massachusetts he still believed that a pure church might be found if only he were to search for it diligently enough. In later years, though, Williams abandoned the search altogether. He became convinced that churches could not be established willy-nilly just because a band of individuals decided to form one. To found a church one needed a properly ordained minister, and - here was the rub - so far as Williams could tell, no such ministers existed any longer. To be ordained, one had to receive ordination from someone properly ordained by a minister of a true church. Now this chain of ordination had proceeded in an orderly fashion during the early years of the church. Christ had ordained apostles; they, in turn, had ordained church ministers; the ministers had ordained their successors; and so on. But, eventually, Williams thought, the chain had been disrupted. The line of apostolic succession had been severed by Constantine's nationalization of Christianity in the fourth century. At that point, Williams believed, the true church had died, and with it the chain of ordinations that kept the ministry alive." Roger Williams liked to speak of a hedge separating church and state and how when you removed the hedge, state corrupted religion. He was more concerned about the state's ill effect on religion than true religions ill effects on state when there existed no hedge or wall separating the two. Isiah 5:4 'What could have been done more to my vineyard, that I have not done in it? wherefore, when I looked that it should bring forth grapes, brought it forth wild grapes? 5:5 And now go to; I will tell you what I will do to my vineyard: I will take away the hedge thereof, and it shall be eaten up; and break down the wall thereof, and it shall be trodden down' (my interjection not Hall) "Thereafter, the world was ruled by the anti-Christian Roman Catholic Church and had become a wilderness in which true believers roamed as pilgrims, without benefit of ministry or sacrament." (Hall)Amos 8:12 "And they shall wander from sea to sea, and from the north even to the east, they shall run to and fro to seek the word of the LORD, and shall not find it."If anyone is fulfillment of this prophecy, it is Roger Williams. He searched all over England and then to New England. He founded a group called the seekers and encouraged all religions to come to Rhode Island, because he wanted to find the truth if it existed in its fullness. (my interjection not Hall) John Cotton wrote this about how Williams began to cut himself off from the New England churches because he didn't believe they possessed the authority to perform ordinances."And then [he] fell off from his ministry, and then from all church-fellowship, and then from his baptism and then from the Lord's Supper, and from all ordinances of Christ dispensed in any church-way, till God shall stir up himself, or some other new apostles to recover, and restore all the ordinances, and churches of Christ out of the ruins of Anti christian apostasy."". . . . Williams eventually abandoned any hope of finding a pure church. He associated for a few months with an infant congregation of Baptists but ultimately separated from them because even they could not claim to have preserved the legacy of the apostolic church. How could they baptize anyone without a properly ordained minister to perform the baptism, and where could they find such a minister? In forming the Baptist church, one of the founding members had baptized Williams, who had baptized the remaining members. But now, Williams saw, he was not a true minister and could not conduct the ordinance of baptism. He saw no alternative but to withdraw from his so recently acquired Baptist brethren. They were trying to create a garden out of a barren wilderness of the world and had set upon an illusive quest for a church that had died and would remain dead until God resurrected it in the last days."Jesus said this: Acts 20:29 "For I know this, that after my departing shall grievous wolves enter in among you, not sparing the flock"Roger Williams talks about barren wilderness and lack of the beautiful garden, which is the church. It is described in like terms by Amos, 8:11 "Behold, the days come, saith the Lord GOD, that I will send a famine in the land, not a famine of bread, nor a thirst for water, but of hearing the words of the LORD"But Roger Williams also foresaw a day when God would resurrect the church in the last days which is also consistent with the Bible Isiah 2:2,3 "And it shall come to pass in the last days, that the mountain of the LORD’s house shall be established in the top of the mountains, and shall be exalted above the hills; and all nations shall flow unto it. And many people shall go and say, Come ye, and let us ago up to the mountain of the LORD, to the house of the God of Jacob; and he will teach us of his ways, and we will walk in his paths: for out of Zion shall go forth the law, and the word of the LORD from Jerusalem." This next passage is one of my favorite Roger Williams quotes, because it shows how diligently he searched for Christ's Church, but was unable to be satisfied that it was on the earth in the 1600s and how he knew as a biblical scholar, that there was a need for a restoration of authority to perform ordinances like baptism and there were no missionaries or "messengers to the nations" possessing an authentic message (mine not Hall):"In the poor small span of my life, I desired to have been a diligent and constant observer, and have been my self many ways engaged in city, in country, in court, in schools, in universities, in churches, in old and New England, and yet cannot in the holy presence of God bring in the result of a satisfying discovery, that either the begetting ministry of the apostles or messengers to the nations, or the feeding and nourishing ministry of pastors and teachers, according to the first institution of the Lord Jesus, are yet restored and extant.""Williams saw no alternative but to wait patiently until God at length sent apostles who had the power to start new churches. Until that time, there was no one available either to start a church or to sustain it."

Friday, October 17, 2008

prop 8

http://link.brightcove.com/services/player/bcpid1815820715?bctid=1822459319

Wednesday, October 15, 2008

what are your thoughts

Monday, October 13, 2008

NCAA Football Douglass Rating. 10-13-08

Ok, so here is my final formula. I think this is probably as fair as it can get. It's funny that if you do things based on winning pct. and margins of victory, the stength of schedules seem to take care of themselves.
My formula tries to unbiasedly take into account of 1. how much teams are beating people by and what the opponents winning pct is 2. what is the opponents strength, based on their margins of victory and their opponents win % 3. rewards teams based on wins prorated by their opponents win %.

(margin of victory x opponents win pct.) + (opponents margin of victory * their opponents win pct.) + (5 pts for win * opp win pct)

You'll notice, their are some teams ranked highly who have mediocre records like Nebraska #7 3-3. This is because they beat W. Mich 5-1 convincingly, beat SJSU 3-2 convincingly, beat 2-2 NMSU very badly. They lost to 4-1 VT by 5, lost to Missouri 4-1 and lost to Texas Tech by 6 4-0. So they get points for playing such tough opponents, but don't lose a lot of points since opponents records are so solid.

1- USC 17.74
2- Texas 16.43
3- Missouri 14.84
4- Oklahoma 13.08
5- Penn State 12.03
6- Florida 11.23
7- Nebraska 10.18
8- Georgia 9.95
9- Boise St. 9.86
10- Texas Tech 9.48
11- Ohio State 8.63
12- Oklahoma St 8.63
13- UNC 7.96
14- Alabama 7.87
15- Georgia Tech 7.73
16- Kansas 7.70
17- Michigan St 6.34
18- Iowa 5.99
19- BYU 5.41
20- Wisconsin 5.4
21- Duke 5.31
22- Minnesota 5.25
23- Illinois 5.24
24- Virginia Tech 5.10
25- Utah 5.0
26- Arizona St 4.97
27- Mississippi 4.83
28- TCU 4.76
29- Florida State 4.64
30- Arkansas 3.88
31- Oregon St 3.84

Sunday, October 12, 2008

Rankings as of 2:14 EST after all the games.

As we know, the college football ranking system is a joke. The BCS is the biggest scam in the sporting world so I've tried to devise a system based solely on performance, not subjective voting.

The following are based on margin of victory and opponents winning pct.
It is only against D1 opponents.

Rankings Simple Margin of Victory x only Division 1 Opponents winning pct.

1- USC 14.31 (4-1)
2- Texas 13.05 (6-0)
3- Florida 10.50 (5-1)
4- Missouri 9.86 (4-1)
5- Oklahoma 9.61 (4-1)
6- Penn St. 9.40 (6-0)
7- BYU 7.61 (5-0)
8- Oklahoma State 7.29 (5-0)
9- Tulsa 7.10 (5-0)
10- Georgia 7.09 (4-1)
11- Texas Tech 6.85 (4-0)
12- Boise St. 6.85 (4-0)
13- Nebraska 6.74 (3-3)
14- Kansas 6.25 (4-1)
15- Alabama 5.88 (6-0)
16- Georgia Tech 5.34 (3-1)
17- Iowa 5.23 (3-3)
18- Michigan State 5.10 (6-1)
19- Utah 5.06 (6-0)
20- UNC 5.03 (4-1)
21- Ball St. 4.87 (6-0)
22- Wisconson 3.99 (3-3)
23- TCU 3.96 (5-1)
24- California 3.76 (4-1)
25- Minnesota 3.62 (5-1)

Rankings Avg per game [(Margin of Victory * Opp win pct.) + Avg of Opponents( Margin of Victory * their opponents win %)]

1- USC 15.39
2- Texas 13.85
3- Missouri 13.01
4- Oklahoma 11.05
5- Penn St. 10.21
6- Florida 9.24
7- Nebraska 8.45
8- Georgia 7.95
9- Texas Tech 7.36
10- Boise St. 7.26
11- Ohio St. 6.59
12- Oklahoma St. 6.35
13- UNC 5.89
14- Kansas 5.86
15- Georgia Tech 5.73
16- Alabama 5.63
17- Iowa 4.95
18- Arizona St. 4.35
19- Mich St 4.32
20- Illinois 4.30
21- Colorado 4.09
22- BYU 4.07
23- Wisconsin 4.03
24- Duke 3.93
25- Minnesota 3.62
26- Mississippi 3.57
27- TCU 3.22
28- Arkansas 3.21
29- Florida St 3.14
30- Utah 2.86
31- Virginia Tech 2.85

An interesting not for cougar fans. BYU has the best defense in the country. #1 scoring defense against only D1 teams. My spreadsheet throws out all games against non D1 opponents so this doesn't count the N. Iowa game.
They are only allowing 8 points a game!
Go COUGS!!!

Who was the most important founding father?

Roger Williams and Legacy! We are all Pilgrims in an unholy land.

Roger Williams Legacy Alive and Well!

Contributors

My Peep Blogs

GIS Job Sites

Blog Archive

Jesus

Paul Told the Thessalonians This Regarding the Second Coming.

Roger Williams

The First Vision

Roger Williams and the Gospel.

Great History Books - Must Reads!

Favorite Scriptures

C.Darro's Favorite Sites!